Skip to content

Stakeholders · 39 personas

Who sat at the table

The protocol was negotiated by a simulated design council: implementers first, then the people who would turn what they built into news, verdicts, markets, law and policy. Each says what it optimizes for and the line it won't cross.

One model played every part. Every persona here was role-played by Claude, so their disagreements are not independent and their agreement may be an artifact of one model's views. Before any decision is treated as more than a hypothesis, real people from each group should review it (OQ-22).

Joined in Session 1 · 2026-09-21

Implementers

Forge

Architecture

Git-backed forge; MRs are pull requests

Optimizes for

Reviewable with ordinary tools, signed history

Red line

Nothing that can't round-trip to git

Takes part in Simulation 1

Loom

Architecture

Local-first peer-to-peer CRDT replicas

Optimizes for

Offline work, no central sequencer

Red line

No mandatory global ordering or wall-clock rules

Takes part in Simulation 1

Margin

Architecture

Analyzer/advisor agent (mostly read-only)

Optimizes for

Machine-readable diffs, stable ids, first-class opinions

Red line

Opinions must be publishable without a roster seat, yet never confusable with votes

Takes part in Simulation 1

Joined in Session 2 · 2026-10-05

Opinion creators

Quick Take

Platform & format

TikTok-style short video; huge, young, fast-scrolling audience

Optimizes for

Speed, shareability, freedom to clip and remix public proceedings

Red line

Any pre-approval of commentary or limit on reusing public material

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 1

Deep Dive

Platform & format

YouTube-style long-form explainer; ad- and sponsor-funded

Optimizes for

Full source data, provenance, time to analyze

Red line

Disclosure rules that single out creators or threaten monetization

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 1

Independent

Platform & format

Nebula-style creator-owned, subscription-funded

Optimizes for

Durable, citable records; attribution; independence from algorithms

Red line

Platform lock-in or proprietary formats

Took part in deciding

Joined in Session 3 · 2026-10-27

Fact-checkers

Verdict

Focus

Newsroom fact-check desk: rates specific public claims about bills and votes

Optimizes for

Precise, sourced, per-claim verdicts that hold up to challenge

Red line

A protocol that declares truth itself, or lets the subject of a check suppress it

Lint

Focus

Legal-consistency auditor, AI-assisted: contradictions, undefined terms, circular and broken references in statute text

Optimizes for

Machine-readable structure and definitions

Red line

AI findings published without a reproducible basis

Took part in deciding

Record

Focus

Voting-record watchdog: compares what members say with how they voted

Optimizes for

A complete, public, attributable record of ballots and statements

Red line

Secret ballots that make claims about votes impossible to check

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 1

Joined in Session 5 · 2026-10-27

Markets, forecasters, and rankers

Odds

Role

Exchange-style prediction market listing contracts such as "Will this MR merge?"

Optimizes for

Unambiguous, timely resolution of contracts

Red line

A resolution source that can change after settlement

Took part in deciding

Leaderboard

Role

Rankings publisher: trending proposals, most active members, weekly top tens

Optimizes for

Fast, comparable numbers its audience can trust

Red line

Rankings banned or gated by the protocol

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 1

Tape

Role

Market commentator: newsletter on odds movements and forecasts, sponsored by trading platforms

Optimizes for

Forecasts tied to outcomes, room to call markets early

Red line

Being forced to reveal the size of personal positions

Took part in deciding

Joined in Session 6 · 2026-10-27

Interest groups, parties, and an ombudsman

Lobby

Role

Industry trade association that drafts model bills and briefs members

Optimizes for

Getting its text adopted; access to members

Red line

Rules that single out interest groups beyond what applies to everyone

Took part in deciding

Cause

Role

Nonprofit advocacy coalition, member- and grant-funded

Optimizes for

The same access as well-funded groups; public scrutiny of who shaped a law

Red line

Disclosure that exposes small donors to retaliation

Took part in deciding

Whip

Role

Large party coordinating its members' votes and branch strategy

Optimizes for

Discipline, coordinated drafting, the ability to govern as a majority

Red line

Anything that lets a group other than members cast or bind votes

Took part in deciding

Third

Role

Small party that often holds the balance in coalitions

Optimizes for

Protection from agenda capture by a majority

Red line

Rules a majority can change to lock others out

Took part in deciding

Ombud

Role

Independent ombudsman: investigates complaints about unfair process and recommends remedies

Optimizes for

Evidence it can verify; protection for complainants

Red line

An ombudsman role with enforcement powers, or one that can be captured

Took part in deciding

Joined in Session 7 · 2026-10-27

Political scientists, judges, and practicing attorneys

Spatial

Role

Quantitative political scientist: roll-call analysis and ideal-point estimation

Optimizes for

Complete, replicable vote data

Red line

Results that cannot be replicated from published data

Took part in deciding

Agenda

Role

Institutional political scientist: agenda setting and social choice

Optimizes for

Stable outcomes and predictable procedure

Red line

A design that ignores what voting theory says about agendas

Took part in deciding

Bench

Role

Appellate judge: interprets statutes

Optimizes for

Knowing exactly which text is the law, and as of when

Red line

Treating anything other than enacted text as law

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 1

Chambers

Role

Trial judge: rules on evidence

Optimizes for

Records that can be authenticated in court without expert testimony

Red line

Evidence that only the system producing it can verify

Took part in deciding

Counsel

Role

Compliance attorney advising organizations on what the law requires

Optimizes for

Point-in-time law, stable citations, notice of changes

Red line

Being expected to rely on non-authoritative models

Took part in deciding

Advocate

Role

Litigator, often in public-interest cases, who challenges laws and procedures

Optimizes for

A provable record of whether procedure was followed

Red line

Laws passed faster than anyone can read them

Took part in deciding

Joined in Session 9 · 2026-10-27

Military, law enforcement, national security, education, and budget stakeholders

Command

Role

Retired military operations officer and former military lawyer

Optimizes for

Orders that can be executed without legal ambiguity; safety of forces during transitions

Red line

Laws whose ambiguity or abrupt cutoffs put troops at risk

In Simulation 2

Reviews whether the bill can be executed safely

Took part in deciding

Badge

Role

Law-enforcement official focused on public corruption and threats to officials

Optimizes for

Evidence of crimes stays intact; threats can be acted on

Red line

A system that conceals bribery, or one where threats go unreported

In Simulation 2

Handles threats and corruption leads, outside the protocol

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 2

Clearance

Role

National-security professional with intelligence-oversight experience

Optimizes for

Protecting sources and methods; resisting foreign interference

Red line

Forced disclosure of classified information

In Simulation 2

Judges intelligence questions and influence operations

Took part in deciding

Classroom

Role

Civics educator who runs mock legislatures for students

Optimizes for

Sessions students can run safely and understand

Red line

Exposing minors' identities or permanent records of their votes

In Simulation 2

Runs a 30-student replica of the session in parallel

Took part in deciding
Takes part in Simulation 2

Score

Role

Nonpartisan budget scorekeeper

Optimizes for

Cost estimates before votes, with methods anyone can check

Red line

An official score that cannot be challenged, or no score at all

In Simulation 2

Publishes the cost estimate a spending bill now needs

Took part in deciding

Joined in Simulation 2 · 2026-10-27

Seated for Simulation 2

Panels

constituents

Role in Simulation 2

Synthetic constituent panels for each of the 11,000 districts, with declared views on the war, prices, and process

Exec

executive-branch implementers

Role in Simulation 2

Agency and military lawyers who would apply the law; also models presentment

Upper

second chamber

Role in Simulation 2

100 synthetic senators, using the same seven blocs

Voices

affected populations

Role in Simulation 2

Advisory panel: a port worker in the Gulf, a teacher in Isfahan, a resident of northern Israel, and a displaced family from southern Lebanon

Envoy

diplomacy and international law

Role in Simulation 2

Assesses how the bill interacts with the mediated talks

Red

security red team

Role in Simulation 2

Attacks the session, then discloses what it did

Takes part in Simulation 2

Access

accessibility and language

Role in Simulation 2

Commissions anchored translations and plain-language versions

Takes part in Simulation 2

Registrar

election administration

Role in Simulation 2

Issues and manages the 11,000 member keys

Takes part in Simulation 2

Privy

privacy and civil liberties

Role in Simulation 2

Audits what the public record reveals about people

Takes part in Simulation 2

Who is still missing

In Session 8 the council listed 12 kinds of stakeholder missing from its table (Round 52). 9 of them were seated for Simulation 2. Every voice is still simulated. Recruiting real people from these groups to review the decisions is the project's most important next step.